Courts & Justice · Report · File No. 261114-650
Judge orders BLM to fix Montana grazing review for lack of sage-grouse data
A federal judge said the Bureau of Land Management must supply missing sage-grouse population data for grazing permits in southwest Montana. The ruling shows courts still requiring land agencies to back their decisions with facts.
Every quote in this story (2) was matched word for word against its source. How we work

A federal judge on Friday ordered the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to fix shortcomings in its 2024 environmental review of renewed grazing permits in Montana's Grasshopper Watershed. The problem, he said, is how the agency handled the vulnerable greater sage-grouse 1.
Chief U.S. District Judge Brian Morris, an Obama appointee, granted in part and denied in part motions from three environmental groups and the government 1. He did not throw out the BLM's assessment. He ruled that the agency must include all available data needed for a complete picture of sage-grouse status and population trends in the watershed 1.
What the judge found
Morris said the law the review falls under, the National Environmental Policy Act, "requires defendants to include all relevant data that supports the conclusions in their EA." EA stands for environmental assessment 1. He wrote that the agency seemingly knew, or knew better than it disclosed, the status and trend of the grouse populations 1.
He also agreed with the groups that the BLM left out data on forbs without explanation, which he called arbitrary and capricious. Forbs are plants such as clovers and milkweed that give grouse food and shelter for nests 1. The BLM must either analyze forb height data or explain why it is not an appropriate measure 1.
From Channel GOPSam Forstag declares victory in MontanaSam Forstag · 1.5K plays · captioned, with the source named
The judge rejected some of the groups' arguments. He said the BLM could organize its look at combined effects around specific resource issues rather than individual species, and that the court "will not overly second-guess this choice" 1.
How the case got here
The Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council and Council on Wildlife and Fish sued in 2025 over approval of grazing, livestock management and range improvement projects in the area 1. They say the area holds highly valuable habitat for a bird that has declined for decades from habitat loss 1.
Montana's sage-grouse population fell about 30% from 2021 to 2024, and nearly 50% from 2002 to 2024, according to the groups 12. In March, Morris refused to block spring grazing, which typically starts April 1. At that stage he found the groups likely to succeed on claims that the BLM left out baseline population data. He denied the injunction because they had not shown irreparable harm 12.
Mike Garrity, executive director of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, said the groups were thrilled by the order 1. Justice Department lawyers represent the BLM. They did not immediately respond to a request for comment 1.
What happens next
The BLM must now redo parts of its analysis. Because the judge did not vacate the assessment, the filings reported so far do not say whether grazing must stop in the meantime 1. Whether the government will appeal has not been reported 1.
That matters because the ruling holds a land agency to its own science. The agency was told to show the data behind its conclusions, not simply assert them. It is a modest win for the groups, since the judge kept the assessment in place and turned aside several of their arguments 1.
The Record
- Three conservation groups sued the BLM over grazing and range projects in Montana's Grasshopper Watershed (suit filed in 2025) 12.
- Judge Morris denied a preliminary injunction against spring grazing but found the groups likely to win on missing baseline sage-grouse data 12.
- Morris ordered the BLM to address data gaps on sage-grouse and forbs without vacating its 2024 assessment 1.
Republish this story on your site or in your newsletter
Any site, blog or newsletter may run this story free of charge. Keep the credit line and its link to the original, do not sell it, and edit only for length or house style (the full terms). Photos carry their own licenses, noted under each photo on this page, so use the text alone unless a credit says otherwise.
Paste it into your editor's HTML view. The one-pixel image at the end tells our newsroom the story ran; it stores no reader data.
Sources
- Courthouse News, “BLM ordered to fix environmental assessment for Montana grazing permits” (2026-11-14). courthousenews.com/blm-ordered-to-fix-environmental-assessme
- Missoula Current (Courthouse News report), “Montana grazing grouse” (2026-03-12). missoulacurrent.com/montana-grazing-grouse/
Found an error? Tell the newsroom. Corrections are noted at the top of the story.
More from the files
Judge blocks Trump from closing East Potomac Park golf course for now
U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes ruled Saturday that the administration cannot close the historic public park and course on Sunday, Nov. 15. The case is a test of how far Trump can go in remaking public sites in Washington.
Trump pulls 8th Circuit pick after Arkansas GOP senators balk, slowing lame-duck push
On Nov. 10 the White House withdrew Judge Lee Rudofsky's nomination to a seven-state appeals court and named Arkansas Justice Cody Hiland instead. Hiland now needs a new hearing, and Democrats take over the Senate in January.
Judge lets Trump's $10 billion BBC defamation suit proceed, dismisses one claim
A Trump-appointed federal judge in Florida ruled that the president's defamation claim over a spliced speech clip can go forward. The case tests how far a president can use a personal lawsuit against a news outlet.
Delivered free to your door*
The Morning Edition
One short email at 7 a.m. Eastern: the day's top files, one clip worth your time, and the race to watch. Plain English, large type, no clutter.
*Your inbox. Free. Unsubscribe with one click, any time.








