DOJ says FBI and ICE agents won't serve as poll monitors in Nov. 3 midterm election

The Justice Department says FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents will not serve as federal election monitors in the Nov. 3 midterm election. The statement came in a court filing made Wednesday. ¹

The declaration is dated Oct. 28 and was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It says the department is not using sworn law enforcement officers with arrest powers as monitors "in a law enforcement capacity." ¹

Eric Neff, acting chief of the Civil Rights Division's Voting Section, submitted it. Newsweek reports it was filed in litigation brought by the NAACP over a Freedom of Information Act request. ¹

What the monitors will be told to do

Monitors are being told to watch polling places, take notes and, when appropriate, speak with willing voters outside after they have voted. ¹ They will get training on federal and local law. They are barred from carrying firearms or wearing identifying federal clothing. ¹

From Channel GOPBlanche won't say if Trump ordered Alaska lawsuitTodd Blanche · 170 plays · captioned, with the source named

The filing does list federal employees as monitors. They include staff from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). One Customs and Border Protection employee detailed to the department is also included. ¹

Those agencies have helped ICE carry out the administration's deportation operation. ¹ While serving as monitors, the filing says, they may perform only routine Civil Rights Division monitoring duties. ¹

Weeks of warnings

Attorney General Todd Blanche said monitors would go to every state. He called Democrats' worries "fearmongering." ² Democrats answered with a letter demanding the monitors' names, job titles and training materials. They also introduced a bill to block federal money from sending ICE agents or National Guard troops to polling places. ²

The NAACP filed a complaint on Oct. 16. It says the plan involves more than 1,000 Justice Department employees, including prosecutors and agents, and would intimidate voters of color. ³

The administration has said it has no plans to send federal agents to patrol polling sites. But President Donald Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and FBI Director Kash Patel have declined to rule out their presence. ¹ Asked in May about sending the Guard or ICE to polls, Trump said, "I do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections." ²

Concern grew after two incidents involving federal agents near early voting sites in Florida. One led to a complaint to the FBI. ¹ Federal law generally bars armed federal personnel from polling places, except to repel armed enemies of the United States. ¹

Why it matters

That matters because this promise is in a sworn court filing, not just a public statement. The filing, as reported, covers who serves as a monitor. It does not say what other federal agents might do elsewhere on Tuesday. ¹

Democrats say they will send their own monitors. Their pledge is to observe without interfering. ² Voters who see armed or uniformed federal agents near a polling place can report it to local election officials.

The Record

1. Oct 5, 2026Attorney General Todd Blanche says Justice Department monitors will go to every state and calls Democrats' concerns 'fearmongering.' ²
2. Oct 16, 2026The NAACP files a complaint seeking to block the plan to send Justice Department staff to polling places. ³
3. Oct 28, 2026A Justice Department declaration says FBI and ICE agents will not serve as election monitors. ¹

Sources

1. Newsweek, “DOJ Says It Won't Deploy FBI, ICE Agents as Poll Monitors” (2026-10-29). newsweek.com/doj-says-it-wont-deploy-fbi-ice-agents-as-poll-
2. ABC6 / WSYX (The National News Desk), “Justice Department to deploy election monitors nationwide as critics warn of intimidation” (2026-10-05). abc6onyourside.com/news/nation-world/justice-department-to-d
3. Democracy Docket, “NAACP et al. v. Blanche et al. (Federal Election Monitors Interference Challenge)” (2026-10-16). democracydocket.com/cases/federal-election-monitors-interfer

Found an error? Tell the newsroom. Corrections are noted at the top of the story.