Your Money · Report · File No. 261028-448
Meta investors sue Zuckerberg over new share class tied to California billionaire tax
Stockholders say Mark Zuckerberg pushed through non-voting shares to keep control of Meta while selling stock to cover a possible 5% California wealth tax. California voters decide the measure, Proposition 40, on Nov. 3.
Every quote in this story (2) was matched word for word against its source. How we work

A group of Meta stockholders sued CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday. They accuse him of using a new class of non-voting stock to keep control of the company. The suit was filed in Delaware's Court of Chancery, which hears corporate disputes 1.
The case ties the midterm fight over taxing the very rich to one of the country's most powerful tech executives. California's Proposition 40 would impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of state residents worth more than $1 billion. Voters decide it Nov. 3 12.
What the plan does
Meta would give holders one new "Class C" share for each Class A and Class B share they own. The new shares carry the same economic rights but no votes. The plaintiffs say this lets Zuckerberg sell up to hundreds of billions of dollars of stock over time and still control Meta for his lifetime 1.
Under the deal, Zuckerberg can immediately sell 20% of the Class C shares he receives, which the suit values at about $23.8 billion. The rest unlock quarterly over eight years 1. Meta's filing, as described by Scripps News, says he can use the early sales to pay any Prop 40 bill without losing voting control 2.
From Channel GOPThe bill cut Medicaid for billionaire tax breaksKamala Harris · 135 plays · captioned, with the source named
The plan takes effect Jan. 19, 2027. The plaintiffs want a judge to block it before more than 2.5 billion Class C shares are issued and start trading 1.
What the investors allege
The plaintiffs include two Steamfitters Local 449 funds and two individual investors. They say Zuckerberg told a special committee of directors the change was needed because of Prop 40 and warned that paying the tax could cut his voting power to about 53% 1.
Throughout the process, Zuckerberg claimed that the reclassification was necessary due to California Proposition 40, an initiative on the November 3, 2026 California General Election ballot that would impose a one-time 5% wealth tax on billionaires
The suit also says Zuckerberg threatened to leave California. It calls that threat empty, because the tax applies to people who lived in the state on Jan. 1, 2026. It adds that he could pay over five years and borrow against his shares 1. These are the plaintiffs' allegations; no court has ruled on them.
According to the suit, the committee gave in without concessions. It also says no vote of Class A holders was required, and that Zuckerberg quashed 13 earlier proposals for one vote per share, each approved by unaffiliated stockholders 1. Scripps reports that Zuckerberg-linked entities holding about 56.1% of voting power approved the change by written consent, with no shareholder vote. It also reports that he committed to stay a California resident for eight years 2.
The resulting bargain is unfair
What happens next
A judge must decide whether to block the plan before January. Meanwhile, a Citrin-Politico poll cited by Scripps shows Prop 40 at 46% in favor and 43% opposed among likely voters. Opponents, largely tech executives, have raised more than $340 million 2.
That matters because the fight is no longer only about a tax rate. It is also about whether the very wealthy can rearrange how they hold wealth and power in response to one.
The Record
Sources
- Courthouse News, “Investors sue Mark Zuckerberg over stock scheme to avoid California billionaire tax” (2026-10-28). courthousenews.com/investors-sue-mark-zuckerberg-over-stock-
- Scripps News, “Zuckerberg strikes deal with Meta's board to stay in California as billionaire tax vote looms” (2026-10-28). scrippsnews.com/business/company-news/zuckerberg-strikes-dea
Found an error? Tell the newsroom. Corrections are noted at the top of the story.
More from the files
Judge weighs special master to test DOJ's 20,000-name California voter roll claim
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter said Tuesday he may appoint an independent special master to vet the Justice Department's list of 20,000 alleged noncitizens on California's voter rolls, with a formal order expected Wednesday — six days before the midterm election ends.
Judge disqualifies Trump-appointed prosecutor Bill Essayli from cases over overstay
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Bill Essayli, southern California's top federal prosecutor, cannot oversee several cases because he stayed in a temporary role too long. The order is on hold while the administration appeals.
Democrats prepare for election interference as DOJ targets Alaska, California, Washington
With a week left before the Nov. 3 midterms, Democrats and their lawyers say the Justice Department's pre-election moves could set up challenges to the vote count. The department says it is only enforcing election law.
Delivered free to your door*
The Morning Edition
One short email at 7 a.m. Eastern: the day's top files, one clip worth your time, and the race to watch. Plain English, large type, no clutter.
*Your inbox. Free. Unsubscribe with one click, any time.





