Democrats plan probes of Trump's $4 billion offshore wind buyouts and EPA cuts

Democrats won control of the House and Senate in Tuesday's midterm election. They say they will use that power to investigate two of President Trump's top energy officials: Lee Zeldin, who runs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum ¹². One target is the deep staff cuts at the EPA. Another is the nearly $4 billion in taxpayer money the administration paid companies to give up offshore wind projects ²⁵.

Starting in January, Democrats will decide what hearings are held. They can also issue subpoenas, which are legal orders forcing officials and companies to testify or hand over documents ¹³. They still cannot pass laws over Trump's objections, because neither chamber has the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto ³².

Using the power of the purse

Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine is the lead House Appropriations Democrat overseeing funding for the EPA and the Interior Department. Grist reports she has prepared a long list of investigations and subpoenas, including for Zeldin ¹. Appropriations bills are the yearly spending laws that keep federal agencies running.

Pingree plans to use those bills to make the administration spend climate money Congress has already approved ¹. Under her approach, future bills could take away an agency's core operating money or limit its leaders' travel budgets if the agency refuses to spend funds Congress ordered spent ¹.

From Channel GOPHannah Pingree wins Maine governor's raceHannah Pingree · 152 plays · captioned, with the source named

We can put a lot more teeth into the next appropriations bill

One frozen program Grist named is a $7 billion EPA community solar program ¹. Inside Climate News reports that Democratic House leaders also plan to call Zeldin and other Cabinet members to answer for deep cuts to staff and science funding ².

Paying companies to walk away from wind

Canary Media reports that since spring, the administration has paid nearly $4 billion to persuade companies to give up 12 federal offshore wind leases. In many cases, the companies agreed to invest in fossil fuel projects instead ⁵.

The payments come from the Treasury Department's judgment fund, a permanent account normally used to pay court judgments and settlements ⁴. RWE received $1.22 billion. An American subsidiary of TotalEnergies received money to give up leases off New York and North Carolina ⁴.

Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog, studied the deals. It found the buyouts have not yet shown a return on the energy investments the companies promised in exchange ⁴. Some of that money had already been spent or announced before the deals. "Some of this investment has already been made, so it doesn't really add to the pool to increase the total future supply," said Mia Huang, a policy analyst for the group ⁴.

Rep. Jared Huffman of California is the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee. He has called the deals illegal and said, "I have serious questions, and I intend to get answers" ⁷. He has also said he would widen an existing probe to look at ties between RWE's investment in a Louisiana natural gas export terminal and a firm run by Michael Dorrell, a Trump donor ⁵.

These deals are illegal, and they make our country weaker.

States are suing over the buyouts ⁵. New York's lawsuit says the canceled TotalEnergies project would have saved the state's electricity customers $10 billion, including $500 million for low-income households ⁶.

The administration's answer

Burgum has defended the buyouts. According to the Associated Press, he told a House hearing in May that TotalEnergies was simply refunded money it had already invested in other U.S. energy projects ⁶.

They essentially gave the U.S. government an interest-free loan and their money was refunded to them.

Burgum has also argued that when companies bid on the leases in 2022, they were sold a product that only worked with large taxpayer subsidies ⁶. An Interior Department spokesperson said no one was forced to sign the agreements, which the spokesperson described as voluntary, and that the Justice Department reviewed and approved them ⁶.

Why it matters for your bills

That matters because energy costs were a central issue in the election. Gasoline and electricity prices rose after the Iran war began with U.S. airstrikes on Feb. 28 ². Polling by the Cook Political Report and two partner firms found that more than 70% of likely voters in Iowa, Ohio and Texas thought rolling back environmental rules would either do nothing for affordability or raise costs ².

Voters rejected the Trump administration's failing energy policies, which have pushed electricity bills higher

The pattern is clear: for now, investigations will be the main tool, not new laws. MIT Technology Review notes that major federal climate legislation is unlikely in the next two years. Separately, a bipartisan permitting bill faces a Senate vote on Nov. 9 ³. Hearings and subpoenas can put documents and officials on the record and set up the next fight over spending. Whether that changes policy before Trump leaves office is still an open question.

The Record

1. Feb 28, 2026The Iran war begins with U.S. airstrikes. Gasoline and electricity prices rise afterward ².
2. May 13, 2026Rep. Jared Huffman and other House Natural Resources Democrats question Interior Secretary Doug Burgum about blocking offshore wind and about rising energy costs ⁸.
3. Jun 2, 2026New York and six other states sue over the deal paying TotalEnergies to drop its offshore wind leases ⁶.
4. Sep 30, 2026Roll Call reports a Taxpayers for Common Sense finding that Interior has paid $3.9 billion to six offshore wind developers through the Treasury's judgment fund ⁴.
5. Nov 4, 2026A day after Democrats win both chambers, Rep. Chellie Pingree's plans for investigations and subpoenas, including for EPA chief Lee Zeldin, are reported ¹.

Free to reprint Republish this story on your site or in your newsletter

Any site, blog or newsletter may run this story free of charge. Keep the credit line and its link to the original, do not sell it, and edit only for length or house style (the full terms). Photos carry their own licenses, noted under each photo on this page, so use the text alone unless a credit says otherwise.

<h2>Democrats plan probes of Trump&#39;s $4 billion offshore wind buyouts and EPA cuts</h2> <p><em>By The GOP Files National Desk. This article first appeared on <a href="https://thegopfiles.com/story/democrats-plan-probes-of-trump-s-4-billion-offshore-wind-buyouts-and-epa-cuts">The GOP Files</a> on Thursday, November 5, 2026.</em></p> <p>Democrats won control of the House and Senate in Tuesday&#39;s midterm election. They say they will use that power to investigate two of President Trump&#39;s top energy officials: Lee Zeldin, who runs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum . One target is the deep staff cuts at the EPA. Another is the nearly $4 billion in taxpayer money the administration paid companies to give up offshore wind projects .</p> <p>Starting in January, Democrats will decide what hearings are held. They can also issue subpoenas, which are legal orders forcing officials and companies to testify or hand over documents . They still cannot pass laws over Trump&#39;s objections, because neither chamber has the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto .</p> <h2>Using the power of the purse</h2> <p>Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine is the lead House Appropriations Democrat overseeing funding for the EPA and the Interior Department. Grist reports she has prepared a long list of investigations and subpoenas, including for Zeldin . Appropriations bills are the yearly spending laws that keep federal agencies running.</p> <p>Pingree plans to use those bills to make the administration spend climate money Congress has already approved . Under her approach, future bills could take away an agency&#39;s core operating money or limit its leaders&#39; travel budgets if the agency refuses to spend funds Congress ordered spent .</p> <blockquote><p>We can put a lot more teeth into the next appropriations bill</p><p>&mdash; Chellie Pingree, Lead House Appropriations Democrat for EPA and Interior funding, D-Maine</p></blockquote> <p>One frozen program Grist named is a $7 billion EPA community solar program . Inside Climate News reports that Democratic House leaders also plan to call Zeldin and other Cabinet members to answer for deep cuts to staff and science funding .</p> <h2>Paying companies to walk away from wind</h2> <p>Canary Media reports that since spring, the administration has paid nearly $4 billion to persuade companies to give up 12 federal offshore wind leases. In many cases, the companies agreed to invest in fossil fuel projects instead .</p> <p>The payments come from the Treasury Department&#39;s judgment fund, a permanent account normally used to pay court judgments and settlements . RWE received $1.22 billion. An American subsidiary of TotalEnergies received money to give up leases off New York and North Carolina .</p> <p>Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog, studied the deals. It found the buyouts have not yet shown a return on the energy investments the companies promised in exchange . Some of that money had already been spent or announced before the deals. &quot;Some of this investment has already been made, so it doesn&#39;t really add to the pool to increase the total future supply,&quot; said Mia Huang, a policy analyst for the group .</p> <p>Rep. Jared Huffman of California is the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee. He has called the deals illegal and said, &quot;I have serious questions, and I intend to get answers&quot; . He has also said he would widen an existing probe to look at ties between RWE&#39;s investment in a Louisiana natural gas export terminal and a firm run by Michael Dorrell, a Trump donor .</p> <blockquote><p>These deals are illegal, and they make our country weaker.</p><p>&mdash; Jared Huffman, Ranking member, House Natural Resources Committee, D-Calif.</p></blockquote> <p>States are suing over the buyouts . New York&#39;s lawsuit says the canceled TotalEnergies project would have saved the state&#39;s electricity customers $10 billion, including $500 million for low-income households .</p> <h2>The administration&#39;s answer</h2> <p>Burgum has defended the buyouts. According to the Associated Press, he told a House hearing in May that TotalEnergies was simply refunded money it had already invested in other U.S. energy projects .</p> <blockquote><p>They essentially gave the U.S. government an interest-free loan and their money was refunded to them.</p><p>&mdash; Doug Burgum, U.S. Interior Secretary, Republican</p></blockquote> <p>Burgum has also argued that when companies bid on the leases in 2022, they were sold a product that only worked with large taxpayer subsidies . An Interior Department spokesperson said no one was forced to sign the agreements, which the spokesperson described as voluntary, and that the Justice Department reviewed and approved them .</p> <h2>Why it matters for your bills</h2> <p>That matters because energy costs were a central issue in the election. Gasoline and electricity prices rose after the Iran war began with U.S. airstrikes on Feb. 28 . Polling by the Cook Political Report and two partner firms found that more than 70% of likely voters in Iowa, Ohio and Texas thought rolling back environmental rules would either do nothing for affordability or raise costs .</p> <blockquote><p>Voters rejected the Trump administration&#39;s failing energy policies, which have pushed electricity bills higher</p><p>&mdash; David Kieve, President, EDF Action</p></blockquote> <p>The pattern is clear: for now, investigations will be the main tool, not new laws. MIT Technology Review notes that major federal climate legislation is unlikely in the next two years. Separately, a bipartisan permitting bill faces a Senate vote on Nov. 9 . Hearings and subpoenas can put documents and officials on the record and set up the next fight over spending. Whether that changes policy before Trump leaves office is still an open question.</p> <p><em>Read the original, with every source linked, at <a href="https://thegopfiles.com/story/democrats-plan-probes-of-trump-s-4-billion-offshore-wind-buyouts-and-epa-cuts">thegopfiles.com</a>. Republished under The GOP Files' <a href="https://thegopfiles.com/republish">free republishing terms</a>.</em></p> <img src="https://thegopfiles.com/api/rp/democrats-plan-probes-of-trump-s-4-billion-offshore-wind-buyouts-and-epa-cuts.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="border:0;width:1px;height:1px">

Copy the HTML Paste it into your editor's HTML view. The one-pixel image at the end tells our newsroom the story ran; it stores no reader data.

Sources

1. Grist, “What a historic 'blue wave' midterm means for climate action” (2026-11-04). grist.org/elections/midterms-2026-blue-wave-climate-races-da
2. Inside Climate News, “Democrats Seize Congress, Statehouses in Referendum on the Economy” (2026-11-04). insideclimatenews.org/news/04112026/democrats-seize-congress
3. MIT Technology Review, “What's next for US energy policy after the midterm elections?” (2026-11-04). technologyreview.com/2026/11/04/1148022/us-energy-midterm/
4. Roll Call, “New critique of offshore wind clawbacks: Taxpayers lose out” (2026-09-30). rollcall.com/2026/09/30/new-critique-of-offshore-wind-clawba
5. Canary Media, “Trump's $4B in offshore wind buyouts spur legal blowback from states” (2026-09-01). canarymedia.com/articles/offshore-wind/states-sue-trump-buyo
6. AP (via WSLS), “New York sues over the Trump administration's deal to end an offshore wind project” (2026-06-02). wsls.com/news/politics/2026/06/02/new-york-sues-over-the-tru
7. Office of Rep. Jared Huffman, “Huffman Condemns Trump's Latest Taxpayer-Funded Wind Buyout” (2026-06-17). huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/huffman-condem
8. House Natural Resources Committee Democrats, “Natural Resources Democrats Grill Interior Secretary Burgum” (2026-05-13). democrats-naturalresources.house.gov/media/press-releases/na

Found an error? Tell the newsroom. Corrections are noted at the top of the story.