Congress Watch · Report · File No. 261109-769
Freedom Caucus urges $1 trillion in cuts in a third GOP bill before Democrats take over
The House Freedom Caucus wants Congress to pass a party-line package with at least $1 trillion in spending cuts before January. The letter names no programs, and the Senate has already stalled the plan.
Every quote in this story (2) was matched word for word against its source. How we work

The House Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative House Republicans, sent a letter Monday to Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. It urges them to pass a third reconciliation package and other GOP priorities before Democrats take control of Congress next year 1.
Reconciliation is a budget process that lets the Senate pass tax and spending bills with a simple majority instead of the usual 60 votes. That is why Republicans use it to move bills without Democratic support.
What the letter asks for
The caucus wants a package that includes defense modernization, tax relief for families and at least $1 trillion in spending cuts 1. It also asks Congress to codify President Trump's border security policies, impose congressional term limits, ban stock trading by lawmakers and confirm "as many Presidential nominees as possible" in the Senate 1.
The letter, as The Hill describes it, does not say which programs would be cut. That matters because past Republican cut plans have targeted health and food aid that many older Americans rely on. Readers should watch for those details if a bill takes shape.
From Channel GOPJake Johnson declares victory in southern MinnesotaJake Johnson · 1.1K plays · captioned, with the source named
We must deny them every legislative leverage point possible
The caucus asks for action "in the next 60 days" and says lawmakers should not leave town until the goals are met 1. It also says even members leaving Congress on Jan. 3 should be committed to finishing the job 1.
A steep climb in a short window
Lawmakers have only five more weeks in session, and the next few weeks are already taken up by leadership elections in both chambers 1. The House passed a budget resolution for a third bill in July. It includes $73 billion for defense and intelligence, $12 billion for agriculture aid and $10 billion for a fund to encourage Trump-backed voting restrictions 1.
That resolution has been stalled in the Senate. Fiscal hawks there raised concerns that the package lacks offsets, meaning cuts or revenue to pay for it 1. Breaking Defense reports that Thune did not bring the measure up because there were not enough Republican votes to pass it 2.
Outside analysts are skeptical. Todd Harrison of the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank, told Breaking Defense that the likeliest outcome is that the effort goes nowhere 2. Capital Alpha analyst Byron Callan cut his odds of a reconciliation bill passing in the lame-duck session from 15 percent to 10 percent 2.
I think the most likely case is it doesn't go anywhere, it doesn't even get a vote.
Other deadlines are looming
Congress also faces a separate deadline. The current stopgap funding bill, known as a continuing resolution, expires Dec. 11 2. Callan projects a 50 percent chance of a government shutdown after that date 2.
Harrison noted that Republicans do not have 60 votes in the Senate for any kind of appropriations bill, which is the legislation that funds government agencies 2. He also said Democrats have little reason to deal after winning both chambers by substantial majorities 2.
Why it matters
The pattern is familiar. Republicans in the minority-to-be are looking for ways to lock in policy before voters' choice takes effect. The Freedom Caucus itself frames the push as denying Democrats "every legislative leverage point possible" 1.
The letter is a demand, not a bill, and it faces real obstacles in the Senate. Even so, the $1 trillion figure is large. Any real proposal will show whether Medicare, Medicaid, food aid or other programs are on the list.
The Hill's report did not include a response from Democratic leaders.
The Record
- The House passed a budget resolution for a third reconciliation bill, which later stalled in the Senate over offsets 1.
- The House Freedom Caucus sent Johnson and Thune a letter asking for at least $1 trillion in cuts and action within 60 days 1.
- The current continuing resolution funding the government expires 2.
Republish this story on your site or in your newsletter
Any site, blog or newsletter may run this story free of charge. Keep the credit line and its link to the original, do not sell it, and edit only for length or house style (the full terms). Photos carry their own licenses, noted under each photo on this page, so use the text alone unless a credit says otherwise.
Paste it into your editor's HTML view. The one-pixel image at the end tells our newsroom the story ran; it stores no reader data.
Sources
- The Hill, “House Freedom Caucus urges rapid action on new reconciliation package” (2026-11-09). thehill.com/homenews/house/6208185-gop-urges-legislative-pus
- Breaking Defense, “Republicans have a ticking clock. What can they get done on defense?” (2026-11-09). breakingdefense.com/2026/11/republicans-have-a-ticking-clock
Found an error? Tell the newsroom. Corrections are noted at the top of the story.
More from the files
Thune says GOP may have the votes for a third party-line bill after Tuesday's election
The Senate's top Republican says the votes for another party-line budget bill aren't there now, but might be after the midterms. Some Republicans want spending cuts attached, and one senator has named Medicaid.
Republicans eye lame-duck debt-limit and defense bills, but face votes, rules and time
GOP leaders could use the weeks after Tuesday's election to raise the debt limit and pass defense and funding bills before the new Congress starts Jan. 3. Their own members doubt they have the votes, the attendance or the time.
Thune said voters deserved a say on the court in 2016. In July he said a lame-duck pick can be done
In 2016, Senate Republican John Thune said the next president should fill a Supreme Court seat, and his office said it would not support lame-duck hearings for Merrick Garland. In July, before voters handed the Senate to Democrats, the majority leader said confirming a justice in the lame-duck session 'can be done.'
Delivered free to your door*
The Morning Edition
One short email at 7 a.m. Eastern: the day's top files, one clip worth your time, and the race to watch. Plain English, large type, no clutter.
*Your inbox. Free. Unsubscribe with one click, any time.








