Courts & Justice · Report · File No. 261031-971
Judge dismisses Trump's Wall Street Journal lawsuit over Epstein letter with prejudice
A federal judge in Miami ruled Saturday that President Trump did not prove the paper acted with actual malice in reporting on a letter the Journal said bore his name in a 2003 album for Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal with prejudice is a rare courtroom loss for the president and a win for press freedom.
8 of 11 paragraphs and bullets link directly to a source. The sources are listed at the bottom. How we work
The Epstein FilesThe full timeline, the official documents and the video, on one page →
A federal judge on Saturday threw out President Donald Trump's multibillion-dollar lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over a story reporting on his ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein 2. U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami dismissed the suit with prejudice, ruling that the president did not prove the defendants made defamatory statements with actual malice 2.
The lawsuit was over a story the Journal published last year describing a sexually suggestive letter that the paper said bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album compiled for Epstein's 50th birthday 2. Gayles issued the 20-page ruling Saturday afternoon, finding that Trump failed to prove the paper acted with "actual malice" by reporting on his links to Epstein 1.
It is the second time this year courts have blocked Trump's efforts to sue the paper over stories about his relationship with the disgraced financier 1. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling 1.
Why the ruling matters
The dismissal with prejudice means the case cannot be refiled as it was brought 2. That matters because a president suing a newspaper over its reporting tests how much legal risk newsrooms face when covering public officials. The judge's finding that Trump fell short on "actual malice" is the standard the law sets for defamation claims by public figures 12.
From Channel GOPTrump on pardoning officials: "I'd be allowed toDonald Trump · 178 plays · captioned, with the source named
The pattern is notable: this is the second court loss this year for Trump against the Journal over Epstein coverage 1. The ruling lands three days before the midterm election, though the wire copy does not link the timing to the vote.
What happens next
Because the suit was dismissed with prejudice, Trump would need a different legal theory or a new filing to pursue the claim again 2. The White House has not said whether it will appeal; it did not immediately respond to a request for comment 1.
The Record
- Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed Trump's lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch with prejudice, ruling Trump did not prove actual malice 2.
- Gayles issued a 20-page ruling Saturday afternoon finding Trump failed to prove the paper acted with actual malice in reporting on his links to Epstein 1.
Republish this story on your site or in your newsletter
Any site, blog or newsletter may run this story free of charge. Keep the credit line and its link to the original, do not sell it, and edit only for length or house style (the full terms). Photos carry their own licenses, noted under each photo on this page, so use the text alone unless a credit says otherwise.
Paste it into your editor's HTML view. The one-pixel image at the end tells our newsroom the story ran; it stores no reader data.
Sources
- Axios, “Judge tosses Trump lawsuit against WSJ, Murdoch over Epstein story” (2026-10-31). axios.com/2026/10/31/trump-epstein-wsj-murdoch
- AP News, “Trump lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday letter is dismissed with prejudice” (2026-10-31). apnews.com/article/trump-media-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-d
Found an error? Tell the newsroom. Corrections are noted at the top of the story.
More from the files
House Democrats ask DOJ for special counsel on alleged Trump ties to Epstein
House Judiciary Committee Democrats released a staff report Monday saying there is enough evidence for a criminal investigation. The White House denies the allegations, and Democrats admit Trump's Justice Department is unlikely to act.
Judge warns Trump's $10 billion BBC suit could be dismissed over thin document filing
A magistrate judge says Trump's lawyers turned over just 20 documents, nearly all already in the BBC's hands. She is questioning whether they searched properly and has set deadlines in November.
Judge rules DOJ unlawfully fired Epstein prosecutor Maurene Comey, orders her reinstated
A federal judge in Manhattan said the Justice Department broke civil service law when it fired Maurene Comey in July 2025. He ordered her job restored retroactively.
Delivered free to your door*
The Morning Edition
One short email at 7 a.m. Eastern: the day's top files, one clip worth your time, and the race to watch. Plain English, large type, no clutter.
*Your inbox. Free. Unsubscribe with one click, any time.



